The article
begins by talking about a few of the specific movements of feminism. “First wave” feminism was the political
movement of the 19th century where women fought for the right to
vote. “Second wave” feminism of the late
60’s/early 70’s sought to achieve greater equality for women in education, the
workplace, and the home. The feminist movement we are in now is considered “third
wave”. This movement places a greater
emphasis on intersectionality. Some
scholars object to this “wave” model because it ignores resistance of male
dominance that occurred outside outside of these designated movements or
timeframes.
The next
section of the article seeks to define what feminism is. The author says that feminism rests on 2 sets
of beliefs: the normative claim and the descriptive claim. The normative claim states that men and women
are entitled to equal rights and respect.
The descriptive claim says that women are currently disadvantaged
compared to men in terms of rights and respect. There are many disagreements
within feminism about the ways that women are disadvantaged in comparison to
men, and also the reasons for why these disadvantages occur. One thing I liked about this section of the
article was when it said “Feminists are not simply those who are committed in principle
to justice for women; feminists take themselves to have reasons to bring about
social change on women's behalf.”
One of the frustrations I have right now with the world is that it has
become trendy to identify as feminist, even when one doesn’t actually reall
know what feminism is or what it is trying to achieve. Whenever a celebrity (such as Taylor Swift)
identifies themselves publicly as a feminist, they receive a lot of praise even
though they haven’t actually done anything to change things on women’s behalf.
It’s great that these people are identifying themselves as feminists, and it’s definitely better than trying to
distance themselves from the word “feminist” because they fear it will make
them seem like they hate men, but the next step after identifying themselves as
feminist should be to use their fame to try to bring about social change. If they claim to be a feminist but then don’t
actually use their voice to speak out against the disadvantages women face,
they are not actually a feminist. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that
celebrities like Taylor Swift are publicly proclaiming themselves feminist, I
just wish we would wait to praise them for being feminist until they’ve
actually taken specific actions to try to achieve equality for women.
The next section of the article talks about how feminism
interacts with the diversity of women.
One of the critiques of feminist movements has been that they have
mainly focused exclusively on the issues that affect white, heterosexual, upper
or middle class women. This ignores all
the ways that other women who do not fit this archetype are oppressed. Although the goal of feminism is to end
sexism, this cannot be achieved without attempting to end the other forms of
oppression that women face, such as racism, classism, ableism, homophobia etc. Basically,
feminism that is not inclusive of the experiences of all women is not an effective
form of feminism. Sexism is the
oppression of women because of their gender, and it can take the form of exploitation,
marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and systematic violence The
main focus of feminism is to combat sexism, but it cannot do that without addressing
the other ways in which women are oppressed. “The commonality among the cases
is to be found in the role of gender in the explanation of the injustice rather
than the specific form the injustice takes.”
One of my favorite parts of the article was where it talked about
how “it is a crucial feature of contemporary accounts, however, that one cannot
assume that members of the privileged group have intentionally designed or
maintained the system for their benefit.
The oppressive structure maybe the result of an historical process whose
originators are long gone, or it may be the unintended result of complex cooperative
strategies gone wrong.” I thought this
quote was so relevant to a lot of arguments I’ve had with people who are anti
feminism, and I think I might print it out so that I can read it to them next
time we’re in an argument. One of the
most frequent misunderstandings I’ve come across is people thinking that
feminists hate men and blame them for the disadvantages women face. In my
experience, I have never come across a feminist who feels this way. Their anger is not at men, but at the patriarchal
system we all live in.
I think it is interesting that you identify feminism with a social movement and not an ideology-- or at least, that is what I see you doing when you make working to change the system part of feminism. I think you are right that it is not enough simply to avoid actively oppressing historically disadvantaged groups. There is a duty to actively work towards a more just society. Your point reminds me of the old saying, "If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem."
ReplyDelete