Singer begins
by saying that love is a way of affirming the goodness of the object. It is an act of prizing, cherishing, or
caring about the object of love.
There are
2 ways of assigning the value of the object of love: appraisal and bestowal
Individual
appraisal is deciding what an object is worth to oneself, or deciding how well
it fits our own personal needs and preferences Objective appraisal is deciding
how much something is worth based on how well it fits a community’s needs or
preferences. Or, how the majority of a group of people would value it. It is a
branch of empirical science, specifically directed toward assigning value.
Bestowal is the value assigned by lover.
Bestowal
is not dependent on an objects ability to fit the needs of someone. It is a value the lover assigns to his
beloved by himself, and it is not dependent on the beloved’s actual qualities.
To use Singer’s confusing wording “For now, it is the valuing alone that makes
the value.” Bestowal is also what
differentiates love from strong liking
One thing
that I thought was interesting was that he says that we as humans are always setting
a price on other humans through our judgement of their good or bad qualities, but
when we are in love we cease to do so.
The initial appraisal may be why we enter relationships, but once we
fall in love the actual qualities of our beloved don’t matter as much. According to Singer, we place a value on them
beyond that which can be measured by appraisal.
He loves her as more than an instrument to satisfy needs. It ceases to be about how well she fits his
needs, and turns into how well he can help fulfill her needs. I’m curious about
if the bestowal still applies if after we fall in love we find out our initial
appraisal was wrong. If we fall in love
with someone because we think they are kind and trustworthy, and later we find
out they were lying about who they were, does the bestowal that resulted from
our initial positive appraisal still stand, or is it disqualified?
Bestowal
is also interesting because it seems to be the turning point at which love becomes
selfless. While appraisal is all about
how the other person can fit our own needs, bestowal is about how we can
fulfill their needs. To me it seems that
through doing all these things to fill the needs of the beloved, the act of
bestowal would raise the appraisal that their beloved has of them. However, Singer never mentions how the
beloved feels about this bestowal, so that is purely speculation on my
part. In fact, Singer never mentions
anything about the love needing to be reciprocated by the beloved, so it seems
possible that he thinks love is valid even when it is unrequited.
Singer also
mentions that the beloved cannot be fungible.
There must be something about the particular person that you are in love
which makes you value them above all others.
This is the difference between love and simple desire. Sexual desire could be fulfilled by anyone,
but to be in love there must be some sort of special, irreplaceable connection to
one person.
He also
says that love/bestowal is a way of compensating for any negative appraisal
others might give. If the lover sees has any negative appraisal of his beloved,
it is another need of hers that he can fill. “Love confers value no matter what
the object is actually worth.”
When he
talks about love and morality, he says in love we must only try and help a
person change if they want to change, not because we think they should
change. But he also says part of loving
is caring about our beloved’s wellbeing.
If this is the case, how are we supposed to respond in the case of if,
for example, the person we love is a drug addict? They may not want to change, but if allow
them to continue doing drugs, we are neglecting their wellbeing. What is the
point at which caring for their wellbeing outweighs accepting the choices they
make? Also, he says that love is a
positive affirmation. Is it possible
then, to love someone while still disapproving of certain characteristics they
have? Singer says that the lover treats the beloved as if they were perfect,
but over a long term relationship, there are always going to be times in which
you get mad or frustrated with the person you love. It seems to me that as long
as the majority of our relationship is based on positive affirmation, you can
still have moments where you have negative feelings toward our loved one and
still be in love.
You raise two really interesting issues for the notion of love as bestowal: deception and addiction. If we were deceived about someone and bestowed value on them, what happens when the truth comes to light? Is it simply a choice? For Singer, the bestowal is not a product of the appraisal, but something over and above it. A changed appraisal doesn't automatically change the bestowal. As for addicts, I think the issue is not whether or not we should love someone suffering from addiction, but what is the most effective way to show that love in support of the unrepentant addict.
ReplyDelete